Who knows how our "experts" continue to argue that the vitamins do not need or even that hurt? It 'funny how this position is clearly at odds with the scientific literature and also with the opinion of the most innovative and influential doctors around the world. So why this attitude retrograde and unscientific? Why deny the obvious on vitamins and on preventive and curative properties of many nutrients and herbal remedies, and instead does not close one eye, but both eyes on the side effects and ineffectiveness of many, too many drugs? Mind you the drugs are used and how. But not all, not so Much, not so early in the evolution of a disease and not so little custom.
On vitamins and other so-called supplements are witnessing a battle that's ridiculous: they build desk studies to demonstrate the ineffectiveness (guess who finances them?) And forget the huge amount of studies on the contrary indicate a preventive and even therapeutic role. There are concerns of toxicity (rare and the result of wrong treatment) and not of the shortcomings instead in a huge number of individuals. You even get to talk about "lobby of vitamin producers" in a medical world raped every moment by lobbies true, those of multinational drug. This is not the place to list all the research in support of what I say. Anyone who wants to know more can easily deepen. But I want to mention just one. In the June issue of the prestigious journal FASEB (The Journal of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology), Bruce Ames, professor emeritus of the University of Berkeley, and Joyce McCann have published an article that has the authority to close forever debate on the therapeutic properties of vitamins and other nutrients. Ames, public has worked for years on the role of vitamins in the organism complex biochemical machine and also on the danger of even mild deficiencies,but sustained over time, such as those we are exposed to us modern men. Ames has called the insufficient supply of vitamins to which we are exposed long latency deficiencies, ie chronic shortages that do not cause a real vitamin deficiency as in scurvy or pellagra, but subvert cellular biochemistry, the self-repair capacity of the DNA and thus favor the appearance of many chronic diseases that affect us. Commenting on this latest work of Ames, the director of the FASEB Journal said: "This study should close any debate on the importance of taking a good comprehensive multivitamin every day." We'll see if our experts read this study or if they continue to turn a blind eye.
On vitamins and other so-called supplements are witnessing a battle that's ridiculous: they build desk studies to demonstrate the ineffectiveness (guess who finances them?) And forget the huge amount of studies on the contrary indicate a preventive and even therapeutic role. There are concerns of toxicity (rare and the result of wrong treatment) and not of the shortcomings instead in a huge number of individuals. You even get to talk about "lobby of vitamin producers" in a medical world raped every moment by lobbies true, those of multinational drug. This is not the place to list all the research in support of what I say. Anyone who wants to know more can easily deepen. But I want to mention just one. In the June issue of the prestigious journal FASEB (The Journal of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology), Bruce Ames, professor emeritus of the University of Berkeley, and Joyce McCann have published an article that has the authority to close forever debate on the therapeutic properties of vitamins and other nutrients. Ames, public has worked for years on the role of vitamins in the organism complex biochemical machine and also on the danger of even mild deficiencies,but sustained over time, such as those we are exposed to us modern men. Ames has called the insufficient supply of vitamins to which we are exposed long latency deficiencies, ie chronic shortages that do not cause a real vitamin deficiency as in scurvy or pellagra, but subvert cellular biochemistry, the self-repair capacity of the DNA and thus favor the appearance of many chronic diseases that affect us. Commenting on this latest work of Ames, the director of the FASEB Journal said: "This study should close any debate on the importance of taking a good comprehensive multivitamin every day." We'll see if our experts read this study or if they continue to turn a blind eye.
Vitamins - discussion
Reviewed by Unknown
on
6:30 AM
Rating:
Reviewed by Unknown
on
6:30 AM
Rating:

No comments: